Relative maturity group and its relationships with the non preferential sowing season of soybean
Abstract
The cultivation of soybeans is the main agricultural commodity in Brazil, the increase in the cultivated area in recent years and the productivity of grains is interconnected with numerous factors such as sowing time, water availability, temperature and photoperiod. The objective of this work was to evaluate the duration of phenological sub-periods and the productivity of soybean cultivars from different groups of relative maturation, sown in two seasons in the off-season in the northwest region of the State of Rio Grande do Sul (RS). The experiment was carried out at Agropecuária Bubans geographically located in the county of Ijuí in the state of RS, considered medium locality. The experiment was carried out using a randomized block design with four replications, the experimental units consisted of four lines, four meters long, 0.50 m apart. The treatments were eight soybean cultivars with different groups of relative maturity (4.8, 5.8, 5.9, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 6.7 and 7.8) sown on January 5 and 22, 2019 (from agricultural zoning, the preferred season for sowing in this region is from october to december), constituting an 8 x 2 factorial experiment (Cultivars x sowing times). Assessments of the duration of phenological sub-periods and of the yield components of the culture were carried out, being measured with total plant height, first pod insertion height, number of lateral branches, number of reproductive nodes on the main stem, total number of nodes on the main stem, number of pods with one, two, three and four grains, pods mass of one, two, three and four grains, total grain mass per plant, thousand seed mass and grain yield. The most productive relative maturity group is 6.3 being sown in the first non-preferential season for soybeans in Rio Grande do Sul. The second sowing time changed the dynamics of association of the measured variables, with changes in the cycle, reductions in the vegetative and reproductive period.
Downloads
References
Braccini, A. L., Motta, I. S., Scapim, C. A., Braccini, M. C. L., Ávila, M. R., & Schuab, S. R. P. (2003). Semeadura da soja no período de safrinha: potencial fisiológico e sanidade das sementes. Revista Brasileira de Sementes, 25(1), 76�??86. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0101-31222003000100013
Carvalho, I., Peter, M., Demari, G. H., Hutra, D. J., Conte, G. G., Zimmermann, C. S., �?� Sangiovo, J. P. (2021). Biometric approach applied to soybean genotypes cultivated in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Agronomy Science and Biotechnology, 7, 1�??11. https://doi.org/10.33158/asb.r118.v7.2021
CONAB - Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento. (2019). Série histórica: soja. Brasília, DF: CONAB. Retrieved from https://www.conab.gov.br/conabweb/download/safra/SojaSerieHist.xls
Fehr, W. R., & Caviness, C. E. (1977). Stage of soybean development (Special Re). Ames: Iowa State University. Retrieved from http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/specialreports/87
Ferreira, L. L., Ricardo Viana de Carvalho, P., Fernandes, M. de S., Silva, J. G., Ricardo Carvalho, I., & Lautenchleger, F. (2020). Neural network and canonical interrelationships for the physiological aspects of soybean seedlings: effects of seed treatment. Agronomy Science and Biotechnology, 6, 1�??11. https://doi.org/10.33158/asb.r116.v6.2020
Frota, R. T., Carvalho, I., Demari, G. H., Loro, M. V., Hutra, D. J., Lautenchleger, Francine, �?� Aumonde, T. Z. (2020). Molybdenum and potassium in the foliar fertilization and seed quality in the soybean. Agronomy Science and Biotechnology, 6(V), 1�??9. https://doi.org/10.33158/asb.r117.v6.2020
Hanway, J. J., & Thompson, H. E. How a soybean plant develops. Ames: Iowa State University of Science and Technology: Cooperative extension, service, 20p (Special Report, 53). https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1050&context=specialreports
Hanyu, J., Costa, S., Cecon, P., & Matsuo, �?. (2020). Genetic parameters estimate and characters analysis in phenotypic phase of soybean during two evaluation periods. Agronomy Science and Biotechnology, 6(2008), 1�??12. https://doi.org/10.33158/asb.r104.v6.2020
Meotti, V. G., Raphael, G. B., Beche, R. S. E., & Munaro, L. B. (2012). �?pocas De Semeadura E Cultivares De Soja Na Produção De Forragem. Bioscience Journal, 28(4), 557�??565.
Mundstock, C. M., & Thomas, A. L. (2005). Soja: fatores que afetam o crescimento e o rendimento de grãos. Biblioteca Setorial Da Faculdade de Agronomia Da UFRGS, 31.
Pandey, J. P., & Torrie, J. H. (1973). Path Coefficient Analysis of Seed Yield Components in Soybeans ( Glycine max (L.) Merr.) 1 . Crop Science, 13(5), 505�??507. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1973.0011183x001300050004x
Peixoto, C. P., Câmara, G. M. de S., Martins, M. C., Marchiori, L. F. S., Guerzoni, R. A., & Mattiazzi, P. (2000). �?pocas de semeadura e densidade de plantas de soja: I. Componentes da produção e rendimento de grãos. Scientia Agricola, 57(1), 89�??96. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-90162000000100015
Rodrigues, K., Alvim, D. T., Brito, C. H., Brandão, A. M., & Gomes, L. S. (2011). Redução da área foliar em plantas de milho na fase reprodutiva. Revista Ceres, 58(4), 413�??418.
Rodrigues, O., Didonet, A. D., Lhamby, J. C. B., Bertagnolli, P. F., & Luz, J. S. (2001). Resposta quantitativa do florescimento da soja à temperatura e ao fotoperíodo. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 36(3), 431�??437. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-204x2001000300006
Soares, M. M., Sediyama, T., & Matsuo, �?. (2020). Efficiency and responsiveness of using phosphorus and molecular diversity among soybean cultivars. Agronomy Science and Biotechnology, 6, 1�??11. https://doi.org/10.33158/asb.r108.v6.2020
Streck, N. A., Paula, G. M., Camera, C., Menezes, N. L., & Lago, I. (2008). Estimativa do plastocrono em cultivares de soja. Bragantia, 67(1), 67�??73. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0006-87052008000100008
Ting-ting, W., Jin-yu, L., Cun-xiang, W., Shi, S., Ting-ting, M., Bing-jun, J., Wen-sheng, W., Tian-fu, H. (2015). Analysis of the independent- and interactive-photo-thermal effects on soybean flowering. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(4), 622�??632. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60856-X
Weber, P. S., (2017). Componentes de rendimento e grupos de maturidade relativa que influenciam o potencial de produtividade em soja. 34p. Course conclusion paper (Graduation in Agronomy). Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria - RS.
Zanon, A. J., Winck, J. E. M., Streck, N. A., Rocha, T. S. M., Cera, J. C., Richter, G. L., �?� Marchesan, E. (2015). Desenvolvimento de cultivares de soja em função do grupo de maturação e tipo de crescimento em terras altas e terras baixas. Bragantia, 74(4), 400�??411. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.0043
Zanon, A. J.; Silva, M. R.; Tagliapietra, E. L.; Cera, J. C.; Bexaira, K. P.; Richter, G. L.; Duarte-junior, A. J.; Rocha, T. S. M.; Weber, P. S.; Streck, N. A. (2018). Ecofisiologia da soja visando altas produtividades. Santa Maria, RS: Palotti.
Copyright (c) 2021 Agronomy Science and Biotechnology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
doi.org/10.33158/ASB